Factors that affect Fuel Efficiency, especially on motorcycles,
are often overlooked merely because they are either considered
unimportant or the user is not aware of the significance
in terms of their contribution to the overall fuel economy.
Most of these have been mentioned in the main text but attention
should be drawn to a few of the less considered.
Binding brakes
It
does not take an Einstein to understand that increased friction
and anything that hampers free rotation of the wheels can,
in the final analysis, end up increasing fuel consumption.
Obviously the cure for a situation like this is to get the
system serviced, but consider the rider who unsuspectingly
leaves his foot on the brake pedal even slightly will also
end up wasting fuel. In fact, in simulated tests, a 2lb
weight on the brake pedal increased fuel consumption by
just over 20 percent, surely a heavy price to pay for a
bad habit, a problem easily corrected by a slight readjusting
of the right foot on most two-wheelers today.
Aerodynamics
Cars
travelling at high speeds are greatly affected by aerodynamics
because of their large frontal areas. Two-wheelers in contrast
offer a much-reduced frontal area and in India are not capable
of the speeds where aerodynamics really starts to take effect
on the Fuel Efficiency. As a rule and in the absence of
conclusive data in this regard, any help that a vehicle
gets by way of becoming better streamlined should be worth
a bit and the bikes with well designed fairings could be
better off.
Transmission and the gear ratios
This
factor is linked very closely to the entire Performance of the bike. It is usually believed that a bike with higher
gear ratios would produce better economy and this is only
true to the extent that the rider uses the ratios in a way
that benefits Fuel Efficiency. Sticking a bike in the highest
gear and leaving it there could hurt economy unless it is
on an open road with smooth gradients and the bike is not
being buffeted by strong head winds. Trying to take advantage
of the high gearing on a bike when the conditions are not
conducive, like tackling a hill in top gear, would mean
large throttle openings to maintain speed and a consequent
loss in economy. It would be more sensible to anticipate
the gradient and work up to the right speed in a more controlled
and progressive manner so that sudden and excessive throttle
and a lower gear do not have to be employed to crest the
gradient. Improper riding techniques in such circumstances
could result in a loss of even 20 to 30 percent in Fuel Efficiency, with the risk of detonation and accelerated
engine bearing wear.
Tuning
Wrongly
adjusted ignition timing could account for about 10 percent
wasted fuel. Under full engine load, old misfiring spark
plugs can cost anything from 20 to 40 percent in lost economy.
A dusty and clogged air filter may increase fuel consumption
by seven percent and a leaky float needle and seat may push
fuel consumption up by a staggering 50 percent.
So, with motorcycle manufacturers doing their best to provide
the user with products aimed at delivering the best that
they can, the moral of the story remains that the biggest
contribution to fuel economy comes from smooth riding and
regular maintenance.
|