| Performance |
| 0-60kmph: |
10.9s |
| Quarter
mile: |
25.2s@80.3kmph |
| 30-70
3rd: |
13.2s |
| 30-70
4th: |
16.1 |
| 60-0kmph: |
25.5m@3.1s |
| Max
speed: |
90.5kmph |
| ECONOMY |
| Best: |
84 |
| Worst: |
70 |
| Range: |
924 |
| On-The-Road |
Rs.
32,999 |
| Dry
Weight |
116kgs |
| Max
Power |
7.0bhp@7500rpm |
| Engine |
     |
| Chassis |
     |
| Brakes |
     |
| Appeal |
     |
| ENGINE |
| Type: |
Single
cylinder four stroke, air cooled horizontal |
| Displacement: |
97.2cc |
| Max
Power: |
7.0bhp@7500rpm |
| Max
Torque: |
6.6Nm@5500rpm |
| Bore
x Stroke: |
50x49.5mm |
| Compression
Ratio: |
9(+0.5):1 |
| Power
to Weight Ratio: |
60.344bhp/ton |
| Idle
Speed: |
1500+-300rpm |
| Carburettor: |
SPACO
PHBJ 18 |
| Air
filter: |
Foam
type |
| Oil
Filter: |
Single
wire mesh filter |
| Ignition: |
CDI |
| Starting: |
Kick |
| TRANSMISSION |
| Gearbox: |
Four
speed |
| Primary
Reduction: |
3.72 |
| Final
Reduction: |
3.21 |
| DIMENSIONS |
| Kerb
Weight: |
116kgs. |
| Max
Payload |
130kgs. |
| Wheelbase: |
1250mm |
| Length: |
1950mm |
| Width: |
730mm |
| Height: |
1050mm |
| Ground
Clearance: |
120mm |
| Fuel
Capacity: |
12litres |
| ELECTRICALS |
| Battery: |
12V
2.5A |
| Headlamp: |
12V
35/35W |
| CHASSIS |
| Type:
Steel alloy tubular double cradle |
| SUSPENSION |
| Front:
Telescopic hydraulically damped |
| Rear:
Swingarm type adjustable for preload |
| TYRES |
| Front: |
2.50
x 18 - 6 PR |
| Rear: |
3.00
x 18 - 6 PR |
| BRAKES |
| Front: |
Internally
expandingdrum |
| Rear: |
Internally
expanding drum |
| PRICE |
| Ex-Showroom
Pune: |
Rs.
32,999 |
Seems
all is right with the world if you are a suffering slave in a sweat shop
and the above adage is being proved against the odds every other instance!
Some are born to boss, others have bosses thrust on them and some try
to wriggle their way into the bossman's chair (happens very often when
I am out on tour - talk about the mice at play when the ogre's away!).
I have yet to come to grips as to which category I can place the latest
offering from Kinetic Engineering among the three alternatives I have
listed. If its makers are trying to get it to wriggle to the top then
they might have hit the right idea but they will need better execution
to get there. Detail flair and refinement are areas someone like a stern
boss needs to drill into the KEL mindset but until it happens expect its
products to be bossed around with by the competition.
Which
is a most unfair thing for the new offering from Kinetic which strangely
enough goes by the Boss moniker. If you can see from the combative naming
stance taken by Kinetic for its motorcycle range ever since it launched
the Challenger, while plotting the sales graphs I noticed that they didn't
keep to the direction intended as the military operation unfolded. But
credit Kinetic with gamely fighting the good battle but this is hard-won
experience which can only toughen it up for the bloodier battles just
round the corner. Battles where the ammunition required will need to be
classy, low dowdy segment or not; where the product detailing will have
to be such that it will make even the most jaded of laypersons smile in
lame delight; where the price benefit will also mean less frequent visits
to the service centre; and where the ills of the past will always be remembered.
The
Boss is the one bike which comes closest in spirit and configuration to
the Honda product and while many have profited the world over by replicating
Soichiro Honda's masterpiece, Kinetic can also do the same if they can
give Honda quality at Kinetic pricing. Only one of these two attributes
will not work for it to get its new bike into the exalted position where
it can call the shots. And just as a good Boss listens attentively, to
get the best out of his team and/or situation, it would do well to listen
to Hero Honda customers as to why they buy and keep buying those Honda
products in the millions.
What I liked about the Boss is its buzzy engine which promised much more
than she delivered relative to expectations. Even the handling and ride
were pretty praiseworthy. It goes to show that if it wants Kinetic can
come up with a bike that can hold its own in a cut-throat class. Fact
is, it will need to be consistent in the quality of its series production
units for it to acquire the aura of a manufacturer bikers and consumers
can look up to with respect. Playing Boss is easy, achieving respect is
mighty tough.
TESTER'S NOTES: KINETIC BOSS
Despite whatever one might have to say about Kinetic and its mode of operation
(it has yet to learn much about bikes for sure), the fact remains that
it is a game trier with a fair opinion about itself. Not a bad thing mind
you but one where the dividing line between a hero and a zero is sharp
and painful. But walking the talk is what it does best and its prowess
is in its ability to drum up versions from a base model a la the Hero
Honda way.
Having the best in the business as your role model is not a bad thing
and Kinetic have to be complemented for their reverse-engineered Honda
ohc single cylinder engine. And the new Boss is an honest-to-goodness
effort which looks the dowdiest of the lot but goes on to show the other
two who is Boss, at least in the Fuel Efficiency stakes.
Getting right to the heart of the matter which in this case is stretching
the fuel rupee, the Kinetic Boss rider should get a best of 84kmpl and
a worst of 70kmpl. Or even more 'cause yours truly was at the helm when
we did our fuel and Performance tests on
this motorcycle. But it was no fun riding this bike just for fuel economy
(not enough whoosh though the ride quality was great) but there are millions
of our countrymen who would gladly prove me wrong by enduring the drudgery
so as to smile their way to the bank by saving those crucial rupees every
time they didn't tank up!
But do not slag off the Boss because there are some more good things adorning
it. The tank and the style comes from the beefy Challenger and there is
a nice attempt to remove bulk and weight. Of course the Kinetic boffins
have failed in this process but not completely. Once they realise that
large lug nuts and more weight are a biker's biggest enemy and they act
accordingly during the design stage will they get diehard nitpickers like
yours truly to appreciate their machines. Which must be good news for
the company since nitpickers like me wouldn't be found riding an econo-miser
and that is the segment of the populace the Boss is targeted at.
The parts bin approach has also been resorted to by Kinetic (nothing wrong
in that except for the fact that the Kinetic motorcycle bin is slightly
smaller in terms of models compared to Hero Honda) and they came up with
switchgear, chassis, engine, suspension and other small details from the
Challenger. The integrated grab rail cum large footboards for the pillion
are just what the doctor ordered. And as if to say the Fuel
Efficiency was no flash in the pan, the Boss also asserts itself,
somewhat, and does a 90kmph top whack apart from a free-revving engine
which if it stays put together can cause untold havoc on the competition.
If you care to check out the Performance figures, the Boss is the fastest and the quickest of the trio plus also
has the best Fuel Efficiency but it doesn't
inspire a wee bit. To cap it all is the pricing, a leaf which Kinetic
have taken, for a change, from their other arch rival and neighbour. All
is fair in love and war and biking, though not necessarily in that order.
|